Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Scientific American Warns: 5G is Unsafe

  1. #1
    Administrator Islander's Avatar
    Join Date
    16th September 2007
    Location
    Maine, USA. The way life should be.
    Posts
    19,208

    Default Scientific American Warns: 5G is Unsafe

    Dr. Joseph Mercola
    Tuesday, November 19th, 2019

    According to the telecom industry, 5G, the "5th Generation" wireless network, is required to give people the wireless freedom they crave and need. Described by HP as "blazingly fast," 5G, which is 70 times faster than its predecessor, 4G, "will replace cable internet for good," allowing you to download a two-hour high-definition movie in three seconds flat.1
    5G is also being touted as necessary to enable the development and proliferation of self-driving cars and other future technologies. However, as noted in a May 2019 Forbes article,2 robocar designers are not, in fact, relying on 5G for their development, and the cars themselves do not actually need that kind of bandwidth to perform the required functions.
    While "blazingly fast" 5G might sound attractive to many who have grown up in the internet era, there are significant health and environmental concerns relating to 5G radiation that are not being properly addressed, which may have profound implications both in the short and long term.

    Read more: https://www.greenmedinfo.health/blog...ogIksydlhBeSJ9
    ➤ Happiness is the frosting on the cake of contentment.

  2. #2
    Veteran Member grulla's Avatar
    Join Date
    2nd November 2012
    Location
    Grant County, NM
    Posts
    1,742

    Default Re: Scientific American Warns: 5G is Unsafe

    I would argue and suggest that if one does not need high speed (5G) internet MOBIITY, and/or has access to fiberoptic landline internet, then equally fast fiber optic would be the better and safer choice...IMHO. https://www.whistleout.com/Internet/...fiber-internet
    Last edited by grulla; 12-09-19 at 04:05 PM.

  3. #3
    Administrator Islander's Avatar
    Join Date
    16th September 2007
    Location
    Maine, USA. The way life should be.
    Posts
    19,208

    Default Re: Scientific American Warns: 5G is Unsafe

    Yes, that's a given. The point is, if you live in an urban/suburban location, you'll not have a choice.
    ➤ Happiness is the frosting on the cake of contentment.

  4. #4
    Veteran Member grulla's Avatar
    Join Date
    2nd November 2012
    Location
    Grant County, NM
    Posts
    1,742

    Default Re: Scientific American Warns: 5G is Unsafe

    If you mean, "...not a choice..." in escaping the 5G radiation, I agree. But if you mean a choice of various ISPs, then sub/urban areas, due to higher population densities, are a lot easier to get various internet services, such as fiber optic, then are rural areas where only satellite internet may be available. Living in a rural area, I have a fiber optic cable node hut just across the road from me, but it has only been used for the past 15-20 years for dial/land line service, but not for internet service, aaargh!. Therefore, I have to rely on satellite internet, or perhaps mountain top internet radio.

  5. #5
    Administrator Islander's Avatar
    Join Date
    16th September 2007
    Location
    Maine, USA. The way life should be.
    Posts
    19,208

    Default Re: Scientific American Warns: 5G is Unsafe

    Yup, for years our only access was via satellite, with the Gateway in Galveston. If it was raining in Galveston, Maine subscribers were out of luck!
    Last edited by Islander; 12-12-19 at 09:51 AM.
    ➤ Happiness is the frosting on the cake of contentment.

  6. #6
    Veteran Member Mr. Wizard's Avatar
    Join Date
    25th October 2011
    Location
    East coast, USA
    Posts
    3,165

    Default Re: Scientific American Warns: 5G is Unsafe

    It has been estimated that 5G technology will result in an additional 3 million new jobs and add an additional $500 Billion (with a B) Billion dollars to the U.S. economy. These two data points must be the reason why federal, state, and local political leaders would allow something so harmful to humans and the environment to proceed unabated.

  7. #7
    Administrator Islander's Avatar
    Join Date
    16th September 2007
    Location
    Maine, USA. The way life should be.
    Posts
    19,208

    Default Re: Scientific American Warns: 5G is Unsafe

    Shocking but not surprising. I guess that data is significant enough to persuade municipalities to proceed without any assurances of safety to the public. When in doubt, follow the money!
    ➤ Happiness is the frosting on the cake of contentment.

  8. #8
    Veteran Member grulla's Avatar
    Join Date
    2nd November 2012
    Location
    Grant County, NM
    Posts
    1,742

    Default Re: Scientific American Warns: 5G is Unsafe

    It has just occurred to me that all this uninterrupted 5G RF (radio frequency) coverage might exacerbate yet another nuisance problem already in progress in it's infancy...drones! Where do ya go to hide???

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. New Legislation Will Help Communities Control How 5G Gets Implemented
    By Julieanne in forum Legal Challenges and Action Items
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 10-29-19, 03:16 AM
  2. 5G Squabbles Mask Serious Safety Risks
    By Julieanne in forum Legal Challenges and Action Items
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-23-19, 06:57 PM
  3. Radiation Concerns Halt Brussels 5G For Now
    By Julieanne in forum EMR (Electromagnetic Radiation)
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-05-19, 07:37 PM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-24-17, 07:26 PM
  5. Is Scientific American Censoring GMO-Skeptical Comments?
    By Julieanne in forum Genetic Modification
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 05-01-15, 09:21 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
<<<<<<<< Your Customized Value <<<<<<<<