Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Breasts: A Natural and Unnatural History

  1. #1
    Administrator Islander's Avatar
    Join Date
    16th September 2007
    Location
    Maine, USA. The way life should be.
    Posts
    18,226

    Default Breasts: A Natural and Unnatural History

    I haven't read this, but the reviewer has, and it sounds interesting!

    Lindy West
    Saturday, May 5, 2012

    I don't have any children yet, so my breasts are still more aesthetic than functional. I mostly use them as a food shelf, a cellphone case, and an in-flight pillow. When I was young and single and had less self-esteem, I used to joke that my breasts were "all I had" (good one, unhappy baby self!), but now that I'm older, I don’t have to rely on them to feel beautiful—for the time being, they're just parts of me that fill my clothes and make my back hurt and, sure, make me feel pretty sometimes. I just don’t think about them that much anymore. Thanks to Breasts: A Natural and Unnatural History, a surprisingly emotional book by Florence Williams, though, that's all changing. All of a sudden I can't stop thinking about my breasts. Because it turns out they are total jerks.

    Read the rest of the review, which is quite informative in itself: http://www.slate.com/articles/arts/b...reviewed_.html
    ➤ Happiness is the frosting on the cake of contentment.

  2. #2
    Veteran Member StephenX's Avatar
    Join Date
    13th December 2011
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    699

    Default Re: Breasts: A Natural and Unnatural History

    Another take...breasts are modified sweat glands

    http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2...beginnings.php

  3. #3
    Moderator Julieanne's Avatar
    Join Date
    18th April 2011
    Location
    Roleystone, Western Australia
    Posts
    5,017

    Default Re: Breasts: A Natural and Unnatural History

    'On top of that, breasts (at least in rhesus macaque monkeys, whose milk is similar to humans) can actually determine whether a nursing baby is a boy or a girl, and adjust their milk production accordingly. Milk for girls is thin but abundant, while boy milk is fattier and scarcer—the theory being that girls then must stick closer to their mothers for frequent feedings, thus absorbing their social roles, while boys are easily sated and have time to play and explore. Um, way to prop up the patriarchy by reinforcing gender roles, monkey boobs'.

    I had no idea there was a difference!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. A History of FDA Inaction on Animal Antibiotics
    By Islander in forum Unsafe Ingredients , Food Additives, Toxins
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-08-12, 04:20 PM
  2. The History and Future of GM Potatoes
    By Islander in forum Genetic Modification
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-20-11, 11:31 AM
  3. Script Pad Headed for the History Bin
    By LabDoc in forum Prescription Medications
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-17-11, 07:29 PM
  4. Female Infants Growing Breasts
    By Islander in forum Early Childhood
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-23-10, 01:55 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
<<<<<<<< Your Customized Value <<<<<<<<